Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:00

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
USDA develops potential plan to vaccinate poultry for bird flu - KSL News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Moving sucks, but decluttering helps - The Verge
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
'Razor blade throat': Answers to questions about the new COVID variant - Hays Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How can Substack help creators with their overall business strategy?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.